<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Culture of Trust</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.programmersparadox.com/2009/01/16/a-culture-of-trust/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.programmersparadox.com/2009/01/16/a-culture-of-trust/</link>
	<description>Long form thoughts from a Software Engineer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:42:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.programmersparadox.com/2009/01/16/a-culture-of-trust/comment-page-1/#comment-2220</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.programmersparadox.com/?p=535#comment-2220</guid>
		<description>Hey Chris,

I think that a culture of trust and of accountability go hand in hand.  Accountability helps to establish trust and to re-enforce trust.  I&#039;m not sure you can separate one from the other. 

Accountability by itself doesn&#039;t create stress: it&#039;s unreasonable accountability that does.  The accountability I&#039;m talking about is that a person does what they say they are going to do and that there are reasonable expectations.  Failure is okay and even allowed, since it is a learning experience.  I would argue that failure is even encouraged, because then risk is promoted, with reasonable accountability.

Accountability that leads to stress is when no failure is allowed.  Then you have unreasonable expectations and that is when trust breaks down, because then the game becomes all about managing expectations and not about getting results.  The employee commits to less than they think they can do because they don&#039;t want to fail and then in response the employer or manager requires that they try to do more than they can handle, leading to failure and a vicious cycle begins where trust breaks down.

I do agree that often times accountability doesn&#039;t extend to the top level.  How many managers are out there that are afraid of what their employees have to say about them, so they avoid all feedback from those they manage?  That&#039;s a tragedy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Chris,</p>
<p>I think that a culture of trust and of accountability go hand in hand.  Accountability helps to establish trust and to re-enforce trust.  I&#8217;m not sure you can separate one from the other. </p>
<p>Accountability by itself doesn&#8217;t create stress: it&#8217;s unreasonable accountability that does.  The accountability I&#8217;m talking about is that a person does what they say they are going to do and that there are reasonable expectations.  Failure is okay and even allowed, since it is a learning experience.  I would argue that failure is even encouraged, because then risk is promoted, with reasonable accountability.</p>
<p>Accountability that leads to stress is when no failure is allowed.  Then you have unreasonable expectations and that is when trust breaks down, because then the game becomes all about managing expectations and not about getting results.  The employee commits to less than they think they can do because they don&#8217;t want to fail and then in response the employer or manager requires that they try to do more than they can handle, leading to failure and a vicious cycle begins where trust breaks down.</p>
<p>I do agree that often times accountability doesn&#8217;t extend to the top level.  How many managers are out there that are afraid of what their employees have to say about them, so they avoid all feedback from those they manage?  That&#8217;s a tragedy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.programmersparadox.com/2009/01/16/a-culture-of-trust/comment-page-1/#comment-2219</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.programmersparadox.com/?p=535#comment-2219</guid>
		<description>Mark, you bring up a great point. I do agree that there should be transparency and empowerment within organizations. But in your post you seem to move from talking about a culture of trust to talking about a culture of accountability. I guess you can argue that they are both one in the same, but I think a culture of accountability creates the stress you talk about. A culture of trust reduces stress, in a way. You would be more efficient with work and have the confidence to &quot;just get it done&quot; without someone breathing down your neck afterward. 

I do believe that a culture of accountability should permeate through all levels of an organization. Too many times those at the top level aren&#039;t accountable for their mistakes and the individuals at the bottom get the boot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, you bring up a great point. I do agree that there should be transparency and empowerment within organizations. But in your post you seem to move from talking about a culture of trust to talking about a culture of accountability. I guess you can argue that they are both one in the same, but I think a culture of accountability creates the stress you talk about. A culture of trust reduces stress, in a way. You would be more efficient with work and have the confidence to &#8220;just get it done&#8221; without someone breathing down your neck afterward. </p>
<p>I do believe that a culture of accountability should permeate through all levels of an organization. Too many times those at the top level aren&#8217;t accountable for their mistakes and the individuals at the bottom get the boot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

